Connection Information

To perform the requested action, WordPress needs to access your web server. Please enter your FTP credentials to proceed. If you do not remember your credentials, you should contact your web host.

Connection Type

About the Component Object Model – PB Docs 100 – PowerBuilder Library

About the Component Object Model – PB Docs 100

About the Component Object Model

The Microsoft Component Object Model (COM) defines a standard
way for software components to supply services to each other. Any PowerBuilder custom
class user object can be used as a COM object by providing it with
a runtime environment, a registry entry, and optionally a type library.
Clients built with COM-compliant tools such as PowerBuilder and Visual
Basic can make use of the business logic in the COM object by creating
an instance of the object and calling the methods exposed in its
interface. Depending on the interfaces it supports, the COM object
may also be available to Java and C++ clients.

COM+ enhances
COM by handling more resource management tasks and providing thread
pooling, object pooling, and just-in-time object activation.

About PowerBuilder COM servers

PowerBuilder creates a single PowerBuilder COM server that contains
a PowerBuilder COM object for every custom class user object you select
when you build the project.

COM specifies how objects are created and destroyed, how their
interfaces are exposed, and how their methods are invoked. PowerBuilder COM
servers follow the COM specification; this means that from a client
perspective, the fact that a PowerBuilder COM object interacts with
a custom class user object (through the PowerBuilder virtual machine)
is transparent.

Comparing automation servers and PowerBuilder COM servers

PowerBuilder provides two ways to generate COM objects: in PowerBuilder COM
servers or automation servers. Both are accessible from wizards
and from the Project painter. PowerBuilder COM servers offer many
more features than automation servers.

PowerBuilder COM servers PowerBuilder COM servers can contain more than one custom class
user object. After you code the user objects, you use the Project
painter to generate a single self-registering DLL for all the objects.
You can also deploy the server directly to COM+ if it is
running on the build computer, or create a COM+ package. PowerBuilder COM
objects in a COM server can share runtime sessions, and references
can be passed between objects created from the same COM client.

The COM server also contains an embedded PowerBuilder dynamic
library (PBD) file that contains compiled versions of all the custom
class user objects you selected and any dependent objects, as well
as registry and type library information.

Automation servers Automation servers built from a PowerBuilder custom class user
object contain only one object. After you code the user object,
you build a runtime library from the PBL that contains it, and then
use the Project painter to create a registry file and optional type
library file. When you deploy the automation server, you customize
the registry file for the user’s computer and then run
the file to register the automation server.

You deploy the PowerBuilder virtual machine with an automation
server or a PowerBuilder COM server, along with any other PowerBuilder runtime
files the server requires.

Dispatch, dual, and custom interfaces

Automation servers use a dispatch interface (also called dispinterface)
that allows users to invoke methods on the server using the Invoke method
of a standard COM interface called IDispatch.

COM servers can use custom or dual interfaces, which provide
better performance than dispatch-based interfaces. A custom interface
provides access to methods on the server through a virtual table
(also called VTBL or vtable) that contains pointers to methods in
the server’s interface. A dual interface enables the client
to invoke methods using IDispatch::Invoke or
a virtual table.

For more information, see “Choosing a custom or dual
interface”
.

Summary of differences between servers

Table 27-1 summarizes
the differences between PowerBuilder automation servers and PowerBuilder COM
servers using dual or custom interfaces:

Table 27-1: Comparison of automation servers
and COM servers
Feature Automation server (dispatch interface) COM server (dual interface) COM server (custom interface)
In-process server support Yes* Yes Yes
Generated IDL files No Yes Yes
C++ client support No Yes Yes
Java client support Yes Yes No
PowerBuilder client support Yes Yes No
Visual Basic 4 client support Yes Yes No
Visual Basic 5 custom interface support No No Yes
Support for PowerBuilder structures as
instance variables and method argument types
No No No
Support for all C language datatypes No No No
Support for an embedded type library No Yes Yes
Self-registering servers No Yes Yes
Support for DCOM # Yes Yes Yes
Support for EAServer Yes Yes No
Support for COM+ No Yes Yes
Requires separate proxy/stub DLLs No No No
Requires PowerBuilder runtime DLLs (minimally PBVM100.DLL
and its dependencies)
Yes Yes Yes
Requires deployment of application runtime
libraries built in Library painter
Yes No No

* In-process server is the PowerBuilder execution
DLL (PBVM100.DLL)

# Requires use of surrogate host
to house the PowerBuilder execution DLL


Document get from Powerbuilder help
Thank you for watching.
Was this article helpful?
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x